Inesea · Editorial Standards

How we
decide what
we publish.

“Inesea’s value to our readers rests entirely on one thing: the trust that what we recommend, we actually believe in.”

We publish these standards not as a legal obligation, but because our readers deserve to know how our editorial decisions are made. If something ever seems inconsistent with what we describe here, we want to hear from you.

Our editorial principles

Four commitments.
Every article.

01
Independence Commercial relationships never determine editorial outcomes. A brand cannot pay for a positive review or request the removal of a negative one.
02
Transparency All affiliate links, gifted products, sponsored content, and brand relationships are disclosed — clearly, in plain language, at the point of relevance.
03
Accuracy We verify product details, pricing, and availability before publishing. Where information changes, we update articles and note the revision date.
04
Relevance We only cover products and experiences that genuinely serve women golfers. Our editorial selection reflects our aesthetic and functional judgement, not what is easy to sell.
Product reviews

How we review products.

Every product reviewed on Inesea goes through the same evaluation framework, regardless of whether it was purchased, gifted, or loaned.

01

Initial research

We research the brand, the product line, and the specific item before testing. We look at materials, construction, brand values, and sustainability claims.

02

On-course or practical testing

Where possible, products are tested in real conditions. Apparel is worn on the course across multiple rounds. Footwear is tested across different terrain and weather.

03

Criteria evaluation

We assess fit and sizing accuracy, fabric performance (stretch, breathability, moisture management), durability after washing, style versatility, and value relative to price.

04

Scoring and writing

Our verdict is formed independently of any commercial relationship. We note genuine weaknesses as well as strengths.

05

Publication and disclosure

The review is published with full disclosure of how the product was obtained and any commercial relationship with the brand.

Buyer guides

How we select products
for buyer guides.

Buyer guides on Inesea are curated based on editorial merit. Our selection process:

01

We survey the available market across multiple price points and brands.

02

We apply our evaluation criteria — performance, design, value, brand integrity — to create a longlist.

03

We review user feedback, brand reputation, and, where possible, our own testing experience.

04

We build a final shortlist that reflects genuine quality — not affiliate commission rates.

05

Where products carry affiliate links, this is disclosed. High-commission products are not ranked higher as a result.

“A buyer guide is only useful if its selections were made independently of who pays us. Ours are.”

Commercial relationships

How we disclose
commercial relationships.

Every type of commercial relationship carries a specific disclosure label, applied at the point of relevance — in the article header, near the link, or in the review introduction.

Affiliate link Labelled “affiliate link” or “we may earn a commission” near the link or at the top of the article. Clicking costs you nothing extra.
Gifted product Labelled “gifted by [Brand]” in the article header or review introduction. Gifting does not guarantee coverage or a positive review.
Sponsored content Labelled “Sponsored” or “Paid partnership with [Brand]” prominently at the top of the piece. The opinion expressed remains ours.
Press trip or event Disclosed in the article where relevant — “I attended as a guest of [Brand]”. Our coverage reflects our honest experience.
AI transparency

Our use of artificial intelligence.

Inesea uses AI tools to support — not replace — our editorial process. Specifically: AI assists with content research, SEO analysis, newsletter curation, and product data aggregation. All editorial judgements, product recommendations, review verdicts, and published writing are authored or reviewed and approved by our human editorial team. We do not publish AI-generated content without human editorial oversight. Where AI tools are used in a way that affects the content you read, we will say so.

Corrections

Corrections policy.

We correct factual errors promptly. When a correction is made to a published article, we note the correction at the foot of the piece with the date it was made. We do not silently delete or alter content without disclosure. If you believe something we have published is factually incorrect, please get in touch — we take these reports seriously.

Complaints

Complaints & questions.

If you have a concern about our editorial standards, a specific piece of content, or a commercial relationship you believe has not been disclosed, we want to hear from you. We take editorial integrity seriously and respond to all substantive enquiries.

Get in touch

Questions about
how we work?

If something ever seems inconsistent with what we describe on this page, or you have a question about a specific editorial decision, we want to hear from you directly.

[email protected] Last updated: May 2026 · Reviewed annually
Inesea · Legal

Affiliate Disclosure


Inesea may earn a commission on purchases made through links on this site. This costs you nothing additional — the price you pay is the same whether or not you use our link.

Affiliate relationships never influence our editorial recommendations. Products and brands are selected on editorial merit alone. A brand cannot pay for a positive review, guaranteed coverage, or a higher ranking in a buyer guide. All affiliate links are clearly labelled at the point of use with language such as “affiliate link” or “we may earn a commission”.

For our full editorial standards — including how products are reviewed, how buyer guides are curated, how we handle gifted products and sponsored content, and how we use AI — see our Editorial Standards page. Questions? Contact us at [email protected].

Last updated: July 2026